Comments on: Unified China http://foundinchina.com/2008/05/16/unified-china/ Observations about China from beyond the Middle Kingdom Sat, 03 Dec 2011 15:00:15 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Linan Wang http://foundinchina.com/2008/05/16/unified-china/comment-page-1/#comment-390 Linan Wang Tue, 03 Jun 2008 10:16:44 +0000 http://foundinchina.com/?p=96#comment-390 Sorry you had problems posting before - a couple of your comments got caught in my spam filter (I have no idea why). BTW, I'm a super programer, just let me know if you need help. :) Sorry you had problems posting before – a couple of your comments got caught in my spam filter (I have no idea why).

BTW, I’m a super programer, just let me know if you need help. :)

]]> By: Linan Wang http://foundinchina.com/2008/05/16/unified-china/comment-page-1/#comment-389 Linan Wang Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:55:58 +0000 http://foundinchina.com/?p=96#comment-389 <i>Did China Cause 2003 American Blackout?</i> No, according to my friend Insumg Kim from South Korea, folks in South Korea credit the North. Guys from Iran insist it's Arabic computer geeks. In fact I have a better hypothesis: Hollywood. Hollywood even has a documentary on this one, entitled "Die Hard or Live Free" (Die Hard 4). Talking about espionage, every county does this to others over 100 years. Are you really from UK, the James Bound's country? :) <i>So do China, even if they are a few years away from superpower status</i> So you believe a quasi-superpower is more dangerous than the real one? The apparently weaker one has to explain to the stronger one again and again: "I really don't want a fight with you." The most funny thing is that you believe this situation is not funny. Did China Cause 2003 American Blackout?

No, according to my friend Insumg Kim from South Korea, folks in South Korea credit the North. Guys from Iran insist it’s Arabic computer geeks. In fact I have a better hypothesis: Hollywood. Hollywood even has a documentary on this one, entitled “Die Hard or Live Free” (Die Hard 4).

Talking about espionage, every county does this to others over 100 years. Are you really from UK, the James Bound’s country? :)

So do China, even if they are a few years away from superpower status

So you believe a quasi-superpower is more dangerous than the real one? The apparently weaker one has to explain to the stronger one again and again: “I really don’t want a fight with you.” The most funny thing is that you believe this situation is not funny.

]]> By: stuart http://foundinchina.com/2008/05/16/unified-china/comment-page-1/#comment-385 stuart Tue, 03 Jun 2008 05:35:57 +0000 http://foundinchina.com/?p=96#comment-385 <i>Mark my words: it’s the real propaganda to make you believe you are living in a better system.</i> I'm living in China ;) Sorry you had problems posting before - a couple of your comments got caught in my spam filter (I have no idea why). Mark my words: it’s the real propaganda to make you believe you are living in a better system.

I’m living in China ;)

Sorry you had problems posting before – a couple of your comments got caught in my spam filter (I have no idea why).

]]> By: stuart http://foundinchina.com/2008/05/16/unified-china/comment-page-1/#comment-384 stuart Tue, 03 Jun 2008 05:32:54 +0000 http://foundinchina.com/?p=96#comment-384 <i>On the other side, US have enough power, enough technologies, enough slogans and enough allies (UK, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and now even has military basement in Afghan)</i> So do China, even if they are a few years away from superpower status. Allies would be DPRK, Burma, Venezuela, and half a dozen African nations. Besides, cold war attitudes and paranoia do not require superpower status in order to exist. The general feeling in China, in my view, is that America represents an enemy to be overcome economically and technologically, and the Chinese are emerging as world leaders in industrial, cyber, and military espionage. <a href="http://cupofcha.com/2008/06/01/did-china-cause-2003-american-blackout.html" rel="nofollow">Take a look</a>. On the other side, US have enough power, enough technologies, enough slogans and enough allies (UK, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and now even has military basement in Afghan)

So do China, even if they are a few years away from superpower status. Allies would be DPRK, Burma, Venezuela, and half a dozen African nations. Besides, cold war attitudes and paranoia do not require superpower status in order to exist.

The general feeling in China, in my view, is that America represents an enemy to be overcome economically and technologically, and the Chinese are emerging as world leaders in industrial, cyber, and military espionage. Take a look.

]]> By: Linan Wang http://foundinchina.com/2008/05/16/unified-china/comment-page-1/#comment-380 Linan Wang Tue, 03 Jun 2008 00:19:29 +0000 http://foundinchina.com/?p=96#comment-380 I don't want to start a Dalai Lama debate again. I central points about him are simple: if you admit he is in fact a politician, why not examine him critically? Even if he did promote inter-religion talk, would he be evil free in any topics? Don't reply me, read the <a href="http://www.iivs.de/~iivs01311/SDLE/Contents.htm" rel="nofollow">"Shadow of Dalai Lama"</a> first. (Note, the authors were closed to him at the beginning.) As one of my local friends here had said, lots of folks here think he is JC. It's selective blind to worship any politician. Let's talk about the ongoing cold war between China and the west. I don't want to say nonsenses like China is a friendly power, has no record of invasion. I just check the ability. Do you really think China is capable of starting the war while it is in fact still an infant player in the game? Cold War rule #1, it's a game for same level powers. Only few years ago, Chinese economic leg was even thinner than UK, which is no bigger than 1/30 of China. Chinese may be attacktive, but not stupid. On the other side, US have enough power, enough technologies, enough slogans and enough allies (UK, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and now even has military basement in Afghan). It's obvious who really wants a war. We have a saying in Chinese "Tu si hu bei" ( The fox feels sorrow when it sees the dead rabbit, because it is in the same situation like the dead rabbit in front of the hunter). There are plenty of rabbits, USSR, eastern European countries, and now Muslim countries. Muslims are now dying (let's ignore these perfect excuses for a moment). However, not too long ago, Reagan used them fighting against USSR, "People of the Book(Old Testimony) fight against who are not (communists)". I am sure it is perfectly inspirational to reused it again upon Chinese. I don’t want to start a Dalai Lama debate again. I central points about him are simple: if you admit he is in fact a politician, why not examine him critically? Even if he did promote inter-religion talk, would he be evil free in any topics? Don’t reply me, read the “Shadow of Dalai Lama” first. (Note, the authors were closed to him at the beginning.) As one of my local friends here had said, lots of folks here think he is JC. It’s selective blind to worship any politician.

Let’s talk about the ongoing cold war between China and the west. I don’t want to say nonsenses like China is a friendly power, has no record of invasion. I just check the ability. Do you really think China is capable of starting the war while it is in fact still an infant player in the game? Cold War rule #1, it’s a game for same level powers. Only few years ago, Chinese economic leg was even thinner than UK, which is no bigger than 1/30 of China. Chinese may be attacktive, but not stupid. On the other side, US have enough power, enough technologies, enough slogans and enough allies (UK, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, and now even has military basement in Afghan). It’s obvious who really wants a war.

We have a saying in Chinese “Tu si hu bei” ( The fox feels sorrow when it sees the dead rabbit, because it is in the same situation like the dead rabbit in front of the hunter). There are plenty of rabbits, USSR, eastern European countries, and now Muslim countries. Muslims are now dying (let’s ignore these perfect excuses for a moment). However, not too long ago, Reagan used them fighting against USSR, “People of the Book(Old Testimony) fight against who are not (communists)”. I am sure it is perfectly inspirational to reused it again upon Chinese.

]]>