Who the hell is Aung San Suu Kyi?
In the last couple of days I’ve had the privilege of discussing the extraordinary Nobel peace prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi in some of my classes. Sadly, although not surprisingly, not a single student recognised either her name or the picture that I used at the beginning of the lesson.
Myanmar’s (Burma) internationally recognised and respected prime minister-elect is a mystery figure to the people of China. And I don’t mean that they find her to be a strange individual given to dabbling in the occult; I mean they don’t find her at all. Not in textbooks, not on television, not in the newspaper; and certainly not in the politics classroom. After all, she’s not the type of girl that Beijing has any interest in providing information about.
After Suu Kyi was democratically elected in a general election in 1990 by an overwhelming margin, the military junta decided that she belonged under lock and key rather than acting out her rightful place as head of government. The people’s choice has since spent the majority of the intervening years under house arrest, where she continues to fight with grace and determination for democracy and justice in Myanmar.
I’m prepared to concede that a significant percentage of 20 year-old university students around the globe may also be unaware of the existence of Aung San Suu Kyi. But in their cases (DPRK and a few others excepted) it’s because they’re not inclined to pick up a newspaper, whereas in China the reason is that the information is simply not available. It’s not that Myanmar is never in the news, as witnessed by the recent coverage of the cyclone disaster (a favourable comparison in relief efforts for the CCP). Rather, as one might suspect, it’s because China does a lot of business with the military dictatorship and has no material interest in altering the status quo. The argument that China doesn’t interfere in the internal affairs of other countries is not valid here; it’s certainly not interference to provide factual information about the nature of Myanmar’s regime and the suffering and death they have caused.
In fairness, China is not alone in supporting Myanmar’s despots, as this article from last year indicates. But it is certain that as long as China refuses to acknowledge the military junta as violators of human rights, they cannot seriously be considered either globally or regionally responsible.
Bear in mind that Beijing has no problems when it comes to reporting on the domestic policies of other countries. Not all other countries, of course; Zimbabwe would be another example of conspicuous silence, but then Mugabe and Myanmar’s military junta have a lot in common. Leaving aside that particular comparison, Myanmar is China’s neighbour and should have a flourishing economy founded on tourism, vast natural resources, and a rich cultural heritage. Instead, the people have suffered violence and economic catastrophe under the junta’s restrictive and vengeful regime.
China didn’t invent a foreign policy based on self-interest; recent history can provide countless examples of the transgressions of other nations. But this is happening in China’s own backyard. And they are interfering in the internal affairs of their neighbour when they actively support a regime that undermines the most basic of its people’s human rights and dignities. If China wants to be respected as a responsible world power then it must show the kind of moral leadership that has too often been lacking in those that came before. All Hu Jintao and company need do to signal the end of oppression in Myanmar is to pull the plug. Do they have the humanitarian backbone necessary to do this? Somehow I doubt it.
Before responding, please consider that last sentence carefully. I’m going to delete any knee-jerk responses along the lines of “yeah, but look what your/that/XXX country did…”
May 28th, 2008 at 8:05 am
I agree with every word – it’s sad isn’t it? The only upside I can see is here in Shenzhen ( south east China) I can get BBC World and CNN, who are both featuring Aung San Suu Kyi prominently on their coverage of the Myanmar disaster and the generals part in her, and her countries continuing misery. How many Chinese watch CNN or the BBC I don’t know, but with the governments pushing English – it must be more than a few – and I would guess it is an audience that is growing. One more small crumb of comfort, the facts are being reported and recorded, and the truth will out, and history will condemn the guilty and honour the great – Aung San Suu Kyi.
May 28th, 2008 at 10:47 am
Santoi – thanks for visiting.
It’s good that outside news sources are available in some regions, but both the BBC and CNN are still recovering from the CCP’s recent so-called ‘western media bias’ campaign.
Nevertheless, if reports are not implicating China directly, viewers should be able to accept that the military junta in Myanmar should not be supported.
That said, nobody in China is about to petition their government on a questionable relationship with brutal dictators.
May 28th, 2008 at 11:26 am
Shes a great woman,she abandon the comfortable life in the UK.Then return 2 Burma 4 people in the dark. ccp authoriy shud be shameless bout supporting burma’s brutal junta.
People in Burma need a domocrat system and Aung San Suu Kyi is the best president 2 lead burma 2 a brand new era.and mouring 4 MRS Bhutto ,another great woman of Pakistan.
I fed up wif chinese media,full of chinese traditional history,the leaders trips and schedules,plus some business figures,and much more ads lol.
May 28th, 2008 at 11:36 am
plus the media are all state-run,only a few media can be operation in china,ther from HK and Taiwan,such as Phoenixtv,but the most of stocks r belong 2 chinese State monopoliy,named china mobile,so its not independence as itself thought.
CNN,BBC,24FR,DW can watched just in Stars Hotel,it seems like N Korea,lol.But smart people could use proxy or webTV and know breakin news and top stories of the world.
May 28th, 2008 at 1:38 pm
Mongol Warrior – clearly I can’t allow those comments to stand. Apologies to anyone else who had the misfortune to read them.
May 28th, 2008 at 3:08 pm
it may have been better to have left the comments – said a lot about MW
May 29th, 2008 at 2:51 am
skanger – thanks for visiting.
Perhaps you’re right, but they were very offensive (generally speaking, that is – I’m not so easily offended).
In previous posts MW has argued strongly without resorting to insults. I guess he’s just blowing off steam.
May 30th, 2008 at 3:17 am
What is her policy towards China? If she’s hostile, then you really can’t blame the government for supporting a regime that supports them.
May 30th, 2008 at 5:38 am
Winger – thanks for commenting.
I’m sure Aung San Suu Kyi wouldn’t be hostile towards her neighbours, but she would certainly put an end to the arms deals that give China a stranglehold on her country’s resources.
May 31st, 2008 at 2:12 am
I’m sure Aung San Suu Kyi wouldn’t be hostile towards her neighbours, but she would certainly put an end to the arms deals that give China a stranglehold on her country’s resources.
As someone anonymous has already pointed out:
“When we buy oil, you call it exploitation and genocide.
When you go to war for oil, you call it liberation. “
May 31st, 2008 at 3:25 am
“When we buy oil, you call it exploitation and genocide. When you go to war for oil, you call it liberation.”
I read that. Chinese readers seem very motivated by it. It’s really just a collection of euphemisms, and China is as proficient as any other country in their useage.
May 31st, 2008 at 5:57 am
whether she is hostile toward China or not, she is a brave woman and should be praised.
October 8th, 2008 at 9:54 am
[...] it will make about as much difference to his situation as giving it to jailed Burmese politician Aung San Suu Kyi did: none [...]
November 21st, 2008 at 3:08 am
[...] their despotic, oppressive imitators neighbours and simultaneously dealt a massive blow to Aung San Suu Kyi and her [...]
June 23rd, 2009 at 4:33 pm
[...] than 64 words - for one of the world’s most inspirational figures for her 64th birthday. Aung San Suu Kyi, whose 19th year of on-off incarceration was recently extended through a sham trial, had, at time [...]