A reminder of dark Times

We’re a couple of months away from remembering the 20th anniversary of one the bloodiest atrocities of modern times. The Times today ran the following article from its archives of two decades ago. The numbers quoted are open to question, but reading the article provides a flashback to Tiananmen ’89 and the sick brutality of a regime that turned the army on its own people and got away with it:
June 11, 1989: with up to 7,000 already dead, the killing goes on
Jon Swain in Beijing
I WITNESSED the sickening reality of murderous repression last Friday morning and checked my watch. It was 11.42am, five days after the People’s Liberation Army launched its devastating assault on Tiananmen Square.
Pinned to a wreath was a simple statement: “June 4, the darkest day in the history of the motherland.”
Then, the soldiers stabbed and slashed at students and onlookers with their bayonets, shot them with their pistols and rifles before tanks mangled their bodies in an act of barbarity that will be remembered as one of the darkest days in China’s history.
More than ever last Friday morning, Beijing was a city of anguish and fear. Troops and secret police were out in force to arrest anyone suspected of involvement in the pro-democracy movement.
CCTV, the state television network that just a week before had been broadcasting honest news about the pro-democracy demonstrations, was again fettered, giving telephone numbers for people to denounce and rat on “counter-revolutionaries”. In a grim exercise in propaganda it showed pictures of people being led away to confess their crimes.
With the hardliners of the Communist party under Deng Xiaoping, China’s senior leader, relentlessly gathering power this was, above all, a moment to remain inconspicuous.
For one young man whose world had collapsed on bloody Sunday in Tiananmen Square, the struggle against oppression went on despite the reign of terror. He fearlessly rode his bicycle out of a side street on the east side of the square, waving a red student protest banner in a lone act of defiance against the crackdown.
He was only in his twenties, dressed in slacks and a white shirt. As he emerged onto the main Boulevard of Eternal Peace, two armed policemen seized him and tore the banner from his hand.
There was no struggle and no time to cry for democracy or liberty. With sickening thuds, truncheon blows rained down on the young man in full view of a gathering crowd. He was dragged to an army tent beneath the high red walls of the Forbidden City. From there came a single shot.
A few in the crowd shouted angrily. Abrupt orders to disperse, backed up by a menacing wave of rifles, stilled the dissent.
By such an event one knows that China has reverted to a police state, its ideal of more democracy crushed. The People’s Liberation Army is supposed to love the people, but since the massacre a week ago its soldiers, with rare exception, have been behaving like a foreign army of occupation.
After the slaughter, western diplomats say the army now arouses as much dread and hatred as the Gestapo did in occupied Europe. At a bus stop in the centre of the city on Friday a man said: “This is a fascist state. If we had guns we would overthrow it now.”
The trigger-happy soldiers, who had gunned down people with abandon throughout the week, had by Saturday occupied positions across Beijing. “They have a knife at the city’s very throat,” said an attendant at one leading hotel. “I was in Tiananmen on Sunday morning and my best friend was killed.”
Estimates of western intelligence officials range from 3,000 to 7,000 dead and 10,000 wounded. It seems bizarre, but the first event that led to the bloodbath was a traffic accident. Until that moment, despite the imposition of martial law, both sides had shown remarkable restraint.
Then a police vehicle crashed into cyclists, killing at least one. As word of the accident spread, it generated fresh anger and revitalised the flagging protest movement.
Many atrocities were committed by troops that night. A western military attaché told how a young mother in the Avenue of Eternal Peace had pleaded with the troops to shoot her but spare the baby in her arms. A soldier bayoneted her to death.
One had only to stroll through a residential area of Beijing yesterday to gauge the revulsion for the regime. A statue to youth and vitality was garlanded with wreaths in memory of residents who had been cut down by the army. They included a six-year-old girl and a member of the National People’s Congress, China’s parliament.
Read that last bit again. The “revulsion for the regime” has been swept away through repression and propaganda to the extent that today’s Chinese youth (and most of their parents) thank the regime for saving them from criminals. The rest of us aren’t so easily fooled. Get ready to remember.
April 11th, 2009 at 9:30 pm
Someone thinks this story is fantastic…
This story was submitted to Hao Hao Report – a collection of China’s best stories and blog posts. If you like this story, be sure to go vote for it….
April 13th, 2009 at 12:16 am
“the soldiers stabbed and slashed at students and onlookers with their bayonets, shot them with their pistols and rifles before tanks mangled their bodies in an act of barbarity that will be remembered as one of the darkest days in China’s history”
Wow, this Swain bastard really knows no shame. I have heard of all sorts of stuff about 6.4 (I was actually one of the bystanders pretty closed to the Tiananmen Square), but I have never ever heard anybody, including those Minyun fenqings claiming that the PLA soldiers were stabbing and slashing people with their bayonets. I guess every Englishman wants to be Shakespear (however you spell that). Making up convincing stuff ain’t easy.
Having said that, 6.4 truly was a tragedy for the motherland, for all parties involved.
The Chinese must find closure. Fortunately laowais are not part of it.
April 13th, 2009 at 4:17 am
“Fortunately laowais are not part of it.”
It was a crime against humanity. I think that’s pretty inclusive. But yes, the Chinese must be allowed to find closure. For that to happen the issue must be discussed freely and reflected upon.
Swain’s language may have been a little emotive, Pffefer, but he was there too.
Although Chinese leaders are sure to lack the humility and decency to stand up and be counted this June, as someone who was in Beijing at that time, how do you think the CCP should handle the upcoming anniversary?
April 13th, 2009 at 3:51 pm
stuart,
I agree that the event must be discussed freely, and by doing that a lot of BS, myths, gross fabrications such as what Swain said would be weeded out. Just because he was there, he wasn’t entitled to lying.
You and I all know how the CCP should handle the anniversary. You and I all know it is not going to happen for reasons you and I all know.
April 25th, 2009 at 10:28 am
What a load of bollocks this Swain fellow writes.
7000 dead? Bollocks – more like several hundred.
There was violence in the square – but the students were the ones who instigated it. The army just handled things poorly.
There was no real aim to go in and kill people. Things just got out of hand.
Anyway, most people in China now realize that the students had to be suppressed – it is highly doubtful that China would have had 20 years of unstinting economic growth if these students were allowed to run riot.
April 25th, 2009 at 11:33 am
“Anyway, most people in China now realize that the students had to be suppressed”
And that realization was arrived at how exactly? Open discussion?
April 25th, 2009 at 11:30 pm
And that realization was arrived at how exactly? Open discussion?
Even Chinese people in Hong Kong and overseas – Chinese people everywhere are proud of the great progress China has made in the past 60 years, especially the last 20.
April 26th, 2009 at 12:07 am
And so they should be.
They would be filled with an even greater sense of pride, I believe, if their government gave a little slack on the 6/4 issue.