China has nothing to say to Aung San Suu Kyi

Posted by stuart on Jun 23rd, 2009
2009
Jun 23

China has nothing to say to Aung San Suu Kyi

A friend alerted me recently to the this site, where well-wishers were invited to voice their support – in no more than 64 words - for one of the world’s most inspirational figures for her 64th birthday. Aung San Suu Kyi, whose 19th year of on-off incarceration was recently extended through a sham trial, had, at time of writing, received in excess of 11 000 messages. These included contributions from Bono, Yoko Ono, George Clooney, many world leaders, MP’s, and fellow Nobel Laureates.

Despite attempts by Burma’s junta to bring down the site, words of solidarity continue to pour in; from Morocco to Sweden, Malaysia to Finland, Indonesia to Mexico, Australia to India, Britain to Bhutan – and on and on - words of support have arrived from all walks of life and nearly every corner of the globe.

Nearly.

I haven’t read all 11 000 messages, but among the numerous pages I flicked through not one response emanated from China. Not a single word of encouragement or vestige of hope for Aung San Suu Kyi and her people; and not one shred of evidence that Burma’s powerful neighbour has the will, the integrity, or the moral responsibility to change or educate its people about the suffering going on in her own backyard.

Why am I not surprised?

Crass Obstinacy: the Zhongnanhai Psychosis

Posted by stuart on May 13th, 2009
2009
May 13
Crass Obstinacy: the Zhongnanhai Psychosis

http://www.theage.com.au/

As the early dawn began to light up Beijing on the morning of 4th June 20 years ago, the tragic scene on the left was a shocking reality for the staff at hospitals all over the city.

Unless you adhere to the CCP handbook, that is; in which case nothing happened and anything that suggests otherwise must be hidden at all costs.

In a country where filial piety is valued highly, one would think that a man attempting to visit his ailing parents would be lauded. But instead of allowing human compassion to win the day, the Chinese government decided to detain him without charge. The reason? He was in Beijing in 1989 for the event that never happened.

This report from Yahoo News gives more details:

BEIJING – An exiled Chinese dissident and a leading figure in the 1989 pro-democracy movement has been detained trying to enter mainland China from Hong Kong and held without charge for more than six months, his family said Wednesday.

The phone call from police was the first official acknowledgment of Zhou’s detention. Shenzhen officials repeatedly denied having him in custody, Sufen said from the provincial capital of Chengdu.

It was the second time Zhou Yongjun, a permanent U.S. resident, has been detained while trying to enter China to visit his family. He spent more than two years in a Chinese labor camp in the late 1990s after being detained in Shenzhen, a southeastern city next to Hong Kong.

Zhou’s elder sister, Zhou Sufen, said Wednesday that her brother disappeared in October last year after entering the mainland from Hong Kong. Police informed her Monday that her brother had been transferred from a detention center in Shenzhen to Suining city in the family’s home province of Sichuan.

What is wrong with those fuckers?

I know, I know; it comes as no surprise that they behave in this way, and yet I cling to the expectation that sooner or later they’ll react in a less thuggish and infantile manner. It looks like it’s going to be later. Much later.

Update

The latest of The China Beat’s excellent series of excerpts taken from Phil Cunningham’s forthcoming Tiananmen Moon is now available. Well worth a visit.

China’s indifference to suffering in Sri Lanka

Posted by stuart on May 2nd, 2009
2009
May 2
Chinas indifference to suffering in Sri Lanka

http://transcurrents.com/

This should come as no surprise for a government that views human life (especially non-Chinese life on distant shores) as ultimately expendable in the pursuit of resources, regional strategic influence, and, dare I say, global dominance.

The latest in a long line of ‘pragmatic’ foreign policy initiatives that have impacted directly on the lives and deaths of countless thousands in Darfur, Zimbabwe, and Burma (to name a few prominent examples), has now been revealed as the underlying cause of the Sri Lankan government’s defiance in the face of international calls for humanitarian restraint in dealing with the Tamils: they have Beijing’s backing and they know it.

Timesonline  reports today:

On the southern coast of Sri Lanka, ten miles from one of the world’s busiest shipping routes, a vast construction site is engulfing the once sleepy fishing town of Hambantota.

This is where China is building a $1 billion port that it plans to use as a refuelling and docking station for its navy, as it patrols the Indian Ocean and protects China’s supplies of Saudi oil. Ever since Sri Lanka agreed to the plan, in March 2007, China has given it all the aid, arms and diplomatic support it needs to defeat the Tigers, without worrying about the West.

It certainly seems that President Mahinda Rajapaksa is firmly in Beijing’s pocket given the alacrity with which he’s appeasing his benefactor’s regional goals by pursuing what appears increasingly like a cleansing policy. The CCP’s mouthpiece China Daily has the gall to talk of the unfolding humanitarian crisis and UN efforts to allow aid to the affected region:

A top UN official pressed Sri Lankan leaders yesterday to let aid into the northeastern war zone, as the ruling party won a sweeping victory in an election seen as a referendum on its fight against ethnic Tamil rebels.

The government has pushed deep into the Tamil Tigers’ strongholds in the north in recent months, surrounding the beleaguered rebels and vowing to end the quarter-century war. But reports have grown of starvation and casualties among the tens of thousands of civilians trapped by the fighting.

Well, isn’t that lovely! Beijing once again gives the appearance of having its finger on the humanitarian pulse while simultaneously applying enough pressure to squeeze the life out of thousands of suffering people.

Is there a whiff of hypocrisy about this recent wave of concern? This analysis certainly suggests as much:

None of this diplomatic posturing should be taken at face value. All of a sudden Washington has begun to express concern about the plight of tens of thousands of civilians caught in fighting as the Sri Lankan army closes in on the remaining pocket of territory held by the separatist Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE).

Until recently, however, the US has quietly backed President Rajapakse, the war and the military’s gross abuse of democratic rights. But as the army made rapid advances into the LTTE’s remaining territory from early January and the defeat of the LTTE appeared likely, the US made a tactical shift.

These matters are invariably more nuanced than their face value, but it doesn’t excuse China’s disregard for human rights in the way it pursues its global goals, which, thus far, have little connection with its self-proclaimed ‘peaceful rise’.

To summarise the latest transgression of morality then, Chinese support via its seat at the UN and growing clout as the world’s financier has enabled Sri Lanka to laugh in the face of international criticism, and to look forward to a positive outcome to the $1.9 billion IMF loan the government is seeking. China is effectively saying to Sri Lanka, “give us our naval base and we’ll counter criticism when you start killing an ethnic minority indiscriminately; finish the job and we’ll make sure you get the funds to clean up the mess.”

It all sounds alarmingly familiar. Because it is.

Update

The bloodbath continues. And China’s role in the unfolding slaughter becomes clearer.

Invisible Tibet

Posted by stuart on Apr 27th, 2009
2009
Apr 27
Via an article at the International Herald Tribune I have been introduced to a this blog, a heart-wrenching catalogue of China-induced woe from the roof of the world. At least I imaging that’s what it is, because it’s mostly written in Chinese by the blog’s host, Woeser. Nevertheless, Woeser’s interview with IHT suggests that the blog’s contents would be a wake up call for all those Chinese who have fallen into their government’s propaganda trap. Well, it might be if it weren’t wrapped in a loving blanket of CCP censorship.
  
A couple of days ago Invisible Tibet highlighted the plight of the REAL Panchen Lama, who became the world’s youngest political prisoner at the age of 6 in 1995. Last Saturday was, as far as I can make out, the young man’s (assuming he’s still alive) 20th birthday. Incarcerated at the age of six! What a country!
If your Chinese is up to it, and even if it isn’t, visit the site; the pictures alone tell a story of the beauty and brutality of life on the plateau. But first read the interview:
She moved back to Lhasa, found a job at Tibetan Literature, a government-run journal, and began delving into the history and folklore of Tibet. In 2003, a publisher in Guangzhou put out her first book, “Notes on Tibet,” a collection of prose and short stories that quickly sold out. It was just before the second print run that the authorities took notice. They promptly banned the book, saying it contained “serious political mistakes.”

In their condemnation of the book, her employer, the Tibetan Literature Association, said she had glorified the Dalai Lama, harmed the solidarity of the nation and “exaggerated and beautified the positive function of religion in social life.” They demanded a confession of her errors. She refused, and found herself unemployed.

 

Since then Woeser has become a more vocal critic of the Chinese government’s Tibetan policy. And well she might, for unlike a billion of her countrymen, she’s seen the consequences for herself.

« Prev - Next »